Animoca Brands Middle East Advisory FZCO

Animoca Brands Middle East Advisory FZCO is incorporated in Dubai Multi Commodities Centre (the "DMCC") and is licensed by Dubai's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority ("VARA") (VARA Licence No.: VL/26/02/001) to carry out the following regulated VA Activities and provide services to Qualified Investors and Institutional Investors (as such terms are defined in VARA regulations):

  1. Broker-Dealer Services; and
  2. VA Management and Investment Services.

VA Standards

‍

We undertake a comprehensive due diligence on all the supported Virtual Assets. In our VA Standards assessment, we take into consideration:

  • Its market capitalisation, fully diluted value and liquidity, and whether such metrics have trended downwards over time;
  • Its design, features and use cases;
  • Our need to comply with applicable laws, Regulations, Rules or Directives, including but not limited to those relating to AML/CFT, sanctions, securities, intellectual property, and whether there are any features of the virtual asset which may affect these;
  • Regulatory treatment by global authorities relevant to Animoca Brands, including to ensure that the virtual asset has received the relevant regulatory approvals;
  • Whether a Virtual Asset is prohibited by global authorities relevant to Animoca Brands in relation to the Virtual Asset;
  • The security and immutability of the underlying DLT protocol;
  • Its future development (e.g. "roadmap") as communicated by the Issuer and/or relevant developers;
  • Whether it may be susceptible to price manipulation for any reason, and we implement transaction and trade monitoring tools as mitigation;
  • Conflicts of interest (actual or potential);
  • The background of its Issuer including, but not limited to, relevant experience in the Virtual Asset sector and whether it has been subject to any investigations or claims in relation to fraud or deceit;
  • If the Virtual Asset represents rights to any other assets, the enforceability of such rights;
  • Sufficient assets are available to satisfy any obligation with respect to any VA Activities;
  • Initially and regularly review the terms and conditions of the Virtual Asset to ensure that they reflect, to the extent possible, the operation of any existing underlying physical market and avoid adverse impacts to such market (if applicable); and
  • Review Virtual Asset terms and conditions on a periodic basis for appropriate correlation with any physical market to ensure such terms and conditions conform to standards and practices in that physical market (if applicable).

Crypto Assets Level Disclosure

Animoca Brands Middle East Advisory FZCO
(the “Firm”)

This Crypto Assets Level Disclosure is published pursuant to Rule I.B.1.c of the VARA Broker-Dealer Services Rulebook, which requires the Firm to publish, for each Virtual Asset it offers: (i) name and symbol; (ii) date of issuance; (iii) market capitalisation and fully diluted value; (iv) circulating supply, including as a percentage of maximum/total supply where applicable; (v) whether the Virtual Asset has been subject to an independent smart contract audit and the date of the most recent audit; (vi) the highest and lowest price the Virtual Asset has reached, including when each occurred, stated as both an absolute amount and a percentage change from the current price; and (vii) the largest reduction in price from high to low, stated as both an absolute amount and a percentage change, during any day, month and year, including when each occurred. This information is set out in the table below.

Current prices used for the percentage-change calculations in the “All-Time High / All-Time Low vs Current Price” column below (as at 27 August 2026): Bitcoin (BTC) $78,811.73; Ethereum (ETH) $2,491.77; BNB (BNB) $707.30; Toncoin/Gram (TON/GRAM) $1.73; Polygon Ecosystem Token (POL) $0.1065. Within that column, the first line is the all-time high and the second line the all-time low; within the “Largest Reduction” column, the first line is the largest single-day decline, the second the largest single-month decline, and the third the largest single-year decline — distinguishable by date format (day, month, or year alone).

Data below is compiled from publicly available sources, principally CoinGecko (coingecko.com), cross-referenced against CoinMarketCap (coinmarketcap.com), news reporting on major historical price events, and primary/issuer sources where indicated. All figures are as at 27 August 2026 and will change with market conditions; this page will be reviewed and refreshed periodically. This summary is provided for information only and does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation to trade any Virtual Asset.

Virtual Asset (Name & Symbol) Date of Issuance Market Capitalisation Fully Diluted Value (FDV) Circulating Supply (% of Max/Total Supply) Independent Smart Contract Audit All-Time High / All-Time Low vs Current Price Largest Reduction in Price, by Day / Month / Year
Bitcoin
BTC
3 January 2009 (genesis block) $1.582 trillion $1.655 trillion (at max supply of 21,000,000 BTC) 20,076,000 BTC
≈95.6% of 21,000,000 max supply
Not applicable. Bitcoin is a base-layer protocol, not a smart contract. The open-source Bitcoin Core client has been continuously and publicly peer-reviewed since 2009, but has not undergone a single formal smart contract audit, as none applies to a native L1 protocol asset. $126,080 (6 Oct 2025), -37.5%
$67.81 (5 Jul 2013), +116,124%
≈-37% (≈$7,911→≈$4,970), 12 Mar 2020 — “Black Thursday” †
≈-38% (≈$6,300→≈$3,900), Nov 2018 †
-72.2% (≈$13,850→≈$3,742), 2018
Ethereum
ETH
30 July 2015 (mainnet “Frontier” launch) $300.787 billion $300.787 billion (no maximum supply; FDV based on current total supply) 120,681,000 ETH
No maximum supply (uncapped) – % of max not applicable
Not applicable. ETH is the native protocol asset of Ethereum, not a smart contract. The core protocol and client implementations undergo continuous public review and formal verification, but no single smart contract audit applies to ETH itself. $4,946.05 (24 Aug 2025), -49.6%
$0.4330 (19 Oct 2015), +575,774%
≈-45% (≈$194→≈$107), 12 Mar 2020 — “Black Thursday” †
≈-49% (≈$210→≈$107), Nov 2018 †
-67.5%, 2022
BNB
BNB
ICO concluded 14 July 2017; tokens listed 25 July 2017. Originally issued as an ERC-20 token; migrated to a native asset on Binance Chain in April 2019. $94.205 billion $94.205 billion (based on current total supply; BNB’s original 200,000,000 issuance cap is reduced through scheduled burns, not issued toward) 133,163,000 BNB
≈66.6% of the original 200,000,000 issuance cap (being burned down, not issued toward)
Originally issued as an ERC-20 token (2017); now the native asset of BNB Chain and no longer a smart contract. CertiK provides ongoing ecosystem-level security monitoring (“Skynet”) of BNB Chain; no single audit report applies to native BNB today. $1,369.99 (13 Oct 2025), -48.4%
$0.03982 (18 Oct 2017), +1,776,240%
-44.7%, 12 Mar 2020
-46.8%, Nov 2018
-51.9%, 2022
Toncoin – renamed Gram
TON → GRAM
Originally conceived by Telegram (whitepaper 2018; testnet 2019). Following Telegram’s withdrawal in May 2020, the community-operated network reached mainnet status on 22 December 2020. $4.619 billion $8.973 billion (based on current total supply; maximum supply is unlimited) 2,672,512,955 TON/GRAM
≈51.5% of current total supply (5,191,588,196); maximum supply unlimited
Not applicable. Native asset of the TON blockchain, not a smart contract. $8.25 (15 Jun 2024), -79.0%
$0.5194 (21 Sep 2021), +233.1%
-25.1%, 10 Oct 2025
-30.8%, Feb 2025
-69.9%, 2025
Polygon Ecosystem Token
POL
Originally launched as MATIC via Binance Launchpad IEO, 24 April 2019 (Polygon mainnet, May 2020). Migrated to POL under “Polygon 2.0,” with migration beginning 4 September 2024. $1.140 billion $1.140 billion (based on current total supply; Polygon 2.0 tokenomics permit future annual emissions of up to 2% after an initial period, so supply is not hard-capped) 10,704,000,000 POL
100% of current total supply; supply uncapped going forward under the emission schedule
Yes. The POL token contract and the MATIC→POL transition/migration contracts were independently audited by ChainSecurity (reports published at chainsecurity.com). Exact publication date is not stated on the published summary. $1.29 (13 Mar 2024), -91.7%
$0.06771 (1 Jul 2026), +57.3%
-35.9% (≈May 2022) †
-53.6%, 2024 †

Methodology note — All-Time High / Low: figures are as reported by CoinGecko and reflect the highest and lowest price recorded since public price tracking began for each asset; percentage changes are calculated against the current price as at 27 August 2026.

Methodology note — Largest Reduction: figures show the largest percentage decline recorded within a single calendar day, a single calendar month, and a single calendar year respectively. For Bitcoin and Ethereum, figures exclude each asset's earliest trading history (before 18 July 2010 for Bitcoin; before 30 September 2015 for Ethereum), during which trading volume and market capitalisation were not yet meaningful and the most extreme recorded moves reflect thin, single-exchange trading rather than representative market conditions; BNB, GRAM (TON) and POL have no comparable early-market data-quality concern and are not adjusted. Figures marked † are approximate, compiled from public news and data-aggregator reporting rather than a single canonical daily price feed — a function of the fragmented, 24-hour nature of Virtual Asset markets across exchanges — and should be verified against a licensed market-data provider before external reliance. Where a figure could not be reliably sourced from the public sources reviewed, this is stated rather than estimated.

Sources: coingecko.com (Bitcoin, Ethereum, BNB, Toncoin/Gram, Polygon Ecosystem Token pages); coinmarketcap.com; chainsecurity.com (POL token and POL transition smart contract audits); coincentral.com and en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TON_(blockchain) (Toncoin–Gram rename); portfolioslab.com and contemporaneous news reporting (Bloomberg, CoinDesk, Decrypt, Yahoo Finance) for historical decline data.

Responsible Individuals:

Omar Elassar (CEO)
Tamer Ghresi (Chief Compliance Officer)

Regulatory Disclosures and Policies

Risk Disclosure Statement

As a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP), Animoca Brands is committed to ensuring that clients are fully informed of the material risks associated with investing in or transacting with Virtual Assets.

‍

Volatility Risk

‍

‍Virtual Assets are subject to extreme volatility, and their value may fluctuate significantly. There is a possibility that Virtual Assets could lose some or all of their value due to market conditions or other factors beyond your control.

‍

Irreversibility and Transferability Risk

‍

‍Virtual Assets may not always be transferable. Some transfers of Virtual Assets may be subject to delays, restrictions, or technical issues. Additionally, certain transactions may be irreversible, meaning once they are confirmed, they cannot be undone, which may expose users to potential losses in case of errors or fraud.

‍

Liquidity Risk

‍

‍Virtual Assets may not always be liquid, and there may be difficulty in converting them into fiat currency or other assets. This lack of liquidity could result in substantial delays or losses when attempting to sell or exchange Virtual Assets.

‍

Privacy and Transparency Risk

‍

‍Some transactions involving Virtual Assets are not private and may be recorded on public Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLTs). While these records can offer transparency, they also expose transaction details that may compromise the privacy of individuals involved in the transactions.

‍

Fraud, Manipulation, and Theft Risk

‍

‍Virtual Assets are susceptible to fraud, manipulation, and theft, including through hacking, phishing attacks, or other targeted schemes. These risks may lead to the loss of funds, and Virtual Assets may not benefit from the same legal protections as traditional financial assets.

‍

‍By participating in Virtual Asset activities, you acknowledge and accept these risks. It is essential to exercise caution and ensure that you fully understand the potential consequences before engaging in Virtual Asset transactions.